Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black | Black glare |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 3 has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Even when the Asus ROG Phone 3 and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only a couple of months apart, the Asus ROG Phone 3 is just a little lighter and thinner. Asus ROG Phone 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Asus ROG Phone 3 and Galaxy XCover FieldPro count with really similar displays, because although the Asus ROG Phone 3 has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot worse display pixel density, it also counts with a larger display. Asus ROG Phone 3 has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way higher video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.