Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black | Black glare |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a global score of 87.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only a few months apart, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition is extremely thinner and just a little bit lighter.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has 4 GB more RAM. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a screen that's very similar to the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, because although the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a much worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a way better 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.