Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 94 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-06-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.80 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.40 ounces |
| Black | Matte White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 18 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a general score of 94 against 80.1. Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate's body is newer, much thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate also has 14 GB more RAM.
The Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much worse pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2448px, it also counts with a really bigger screen. Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a way more MP camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate has greater battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.