Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Asus ROG Phone 8's score of 79.5. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is notably older, incredibly thicker and somewhat heavier than the Asus ROG Phone 8. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Asus ROG Phone 8 has Android 14, giving you a couple additional features and a performance increase.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot worse pixel quantity per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a way bigger display. Asus ROG Phone 8 counts with more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior processor than Asus ROG Phone 8, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Asus ROG Phone 8 has longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 22% bigger battery size. The Asus ROG Phone 8 shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is worse for taking photos or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.