Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom's 76.2 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is notably newer than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, it's a lot heavier and notably thicker. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better processing unit than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better display than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.