Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-12-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), having a score of 80.1 against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is newer than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s, but it is way heavier and incredibly thicker. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better looking display than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better processing power than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low light environments and a smaller sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also counts with a lot better video quality.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.