Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an notably older phone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel amount per display inch.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 2 XL. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 2 XL captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with a higher 12.2 MP resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.