Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's way thicker and way heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, providing you some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM. Google Pixel 3a XL captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same sensor size, the Google Pixel 3a XL also counts with a camera in the back with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a much better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.