Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even when Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a few months difference, Google Pixel 4a 5G is notably lighter and way thinner.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same size sensor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.