Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a, with a global score of 80.1 against 76.4. Even being the best phone we are comparing, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is way older, a lot thicker and extremely heavier than Google Pixel 6a. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better processing power than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 6a has a battery lifetime that's very similar to Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery life, although the Google Pixel 6a has 4410mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Google Pixel 6a counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with more mega pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 6a. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 6a, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.