Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's 77 global score. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing here, Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, noticeably thicker and notably heavier cellphone than Honor 50 Pro.
The Honor 50 Pro's CPU is very similar to Galaxy XCover FieldPro's processor, and although the Honor 50 Pro has more RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better amount of pixels per display inch.
Honor 50 Pro features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Honor 50 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.