Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| -- | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels and a little worse count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a way larger screen. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 20 GB more RAM memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 960 GB more internal storage. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 24 percent more battery capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is more expensive than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.