Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| -- | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a score of 92.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition's body is extremely newer, noticeably thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a way better looking screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 2800px, it also counts with a way larger display. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 960 GB more internal storage.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has 20 GB more RAM memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera, a lot higher (4K) video definition, a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.