Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | S-LCD 3 |
| 576 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is incredibly newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than HTC One M9. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
HTC One M9 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. HTC One M9 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it has a bit lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller display.
HTC One M9 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 58% more battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One M9. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the HTC One M9, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.