Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Huawei |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G71 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has an overall score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Despite of the fact that Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design is notably older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is extremely thinner and notably lighter. These phones have the same Android 8.0 Oreo OS, so both of them should provide the user identical OS features.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better screen than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better hardware performance than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little longer battery duration than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor giving a lower image quality and a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design also counts with a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.