Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Huawei |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-04-12 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.02 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Black and Red |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.56 inches (1/1.78") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design has a global score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design's body is way lighter and extremely thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design has newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher amount of pixels per display inch. The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design counts with a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processor than Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little longer battery performance than Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.