Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the previous 8.0 Oreo version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is newer, but heavier and thicker than the LG G7 Fit.
The LG G7 Fit features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a larger screen. LG G7 Fit features a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 4 more cores. LG G7 Fit counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs and a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a way more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.