Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 81 score against 80.1. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The LG G7 ThinQ is an older phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is much lighter and a lot thinner anyway.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a larger display.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality images, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.