Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a score of 84.3 against 80.1. The LG G8 ThinQ construction is thinner and a lot lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG G8 ThinQ features a slightly better screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bigger screen.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG G8 ThinQ features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have a 12 megapixels back-facing camera and the same aperture, the LG G8 ThinQ also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the LG G8 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.