Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 82.5 score against 80.1. Even though LG G8S ThinQ is older than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is notably lighter and notably thinner. These phones come with Android OS, but the LG G8S ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo, giving you some extra features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. LG G8S ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. LG G8S ThinQ captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the LG G8S ThinQ also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features better battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.