Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a general score of 82.7 against 80.1. The LG G8X ThinQ is a extremely thinner and a lot lighter device than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although they were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density.
LG G8X ThinQ takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same sensor size and a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.