Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a overall score of 85.4 against 80.1. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The LG K92 is a notably thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were only released with a couple of months difference.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel density. The LG K92 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processor than LG K92, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG K92 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit longer battery life than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG K92 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.