Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is slightly better than LG Q70's global score of 77.9. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and LG Q70 has Android 10. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better performance than LG Q70. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better display than LG Q70, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display density.
LG Q70 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better battery life than LG Q70, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
LG Q70 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 32 mega pixels resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Q70. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG Q70, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.