Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Black | Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than LG Q8, having a score of 80.1 against 77.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat version, providing the user a lot of extra features and better performance. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a extremely newer cellphone than the LG Q8, but it is way thicker and notably heavier.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better hardware performance than LG Q8, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater number of cores (and faster). LG Q8 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels number in each inch of screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the LG Q8 also counts with a bit bigger display.
LG Q8 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video and a tinier camera sensor providing a lower image quality, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a lot higher video quality.
LG Q8 counts with just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much longer battery duration than LG Q8, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.