Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6, with an 80.1 score against 76.7. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features and increased performance. Even being the best in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also notably thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processor than LG Stylo 6. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher screen density.
LG Stylo 6 counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 has a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the LG Stylo 6 also counts with a more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better battery life than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG Stylo 6, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.