Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a general score of 91.2 against 80.1. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG Wing has older 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the LG Wing and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a few months difference, LG Wing's body is much thinner but also a little bit heavier than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG Wing counts with a CPU that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, and although the LG Wing has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG Wing takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG Wing features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
LG Wing is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.