Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has the older 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola edge's design is much thinner and noticeably lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both were released only a couple months apart.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better processing power than Motorola edge, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better looking screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola edge has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola edge's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Motorola edge shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot larger camera sensor and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Motorola edge not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.