Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's score of 78.5. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is a lot older, noticeably thicker and notably heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version, so it provides some additional features and performance optimizations.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a display that's just as good as the display in Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a way worse screen density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and a way better video quality.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.