Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 83.1 score against 80.1. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a notably newer phone, and it's also incredibly lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Neo has older 12 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixels density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.