Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's body is noticeably newer, notably thinner and a lot lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has the previous 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra count with quite similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way lower pixels density and a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a way bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and video, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a camera with a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.