Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 general score. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version, offering a couple nice extra features. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is extremely older, a lot heavier and notably thicker than Motorola Edge 40.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a screen that is just as good as the display in Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although the Motorola Edge 40 has a much lower pixels count per screen inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 40, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments, a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 2% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.