Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a lot newer device, and it's also thinner and much lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.