Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 81.9 score against 80.1. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is much newer, noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the older 14 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite inferior pixels number in each inch in the screen and a quite lower 1256 x 2760px resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot higher resolution back camera and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.