Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | -- |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | -- |
| 9.03 ounces | -- |
| Black | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), having a general score of 80.1 against 78.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14, so it gives a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels number in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.