Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the older 14 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a way lower pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a really bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a battery life that's very similar to Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery duration.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better images in low light situations, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.