Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer device, and it is also thinner and a lot lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and much less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a way bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a way larger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra feature really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.