Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | LTPS |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a overall score of 81.5 against 80.1. Moto G 5G is a incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though they were released only a couple of months apart. These phones come with Android OS, but the Moto G 5G has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior processor than Moto G 5G. They have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Moto G 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a much better resolution camera in the back. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.