Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black | Surfing blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 82.6 score against 80.1. Although Moto G 5G Plus and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released 3 months apart, Moto G 5G Plus is lighter and noticeably thinner. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better performance than Moto G 5G Plus. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.