Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Black | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G Power (2021)'s global score of 76.5. Even being the best device in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, somewhat heavier and extremely thicker device than the Moto G Power (2021).
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power (2021). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a lot better display than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto G Power (2021) captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Power (2021) also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Moto G Power (2021) counts with as much memory to install games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power (2021). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.