Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus (2021), having an 80.1 score against 79.3. Despite being the best we compare here, we must highlight that it's also an older, heavier and noticeably thicker cellphone. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus (2021). They have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G Stylus (2021), resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.