Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G100 has a global score of 88.9, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. The Motorola Moto G100 design is newer, much thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Moto G100 has 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Moto G100 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G100 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better screen than Moto G100, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Moto G100 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G100 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Motorola Moto G100 has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.