Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 86.2 score against 80.1. Moto G200 5G's design is newer, way thinner and much lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. Moto G200 5G takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher (4K) video quality.
The Moto G200 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.