Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G6 Plus, getting a overall score of 80.1 against 77.5. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, but it is extremely thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper display than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Motorola Moto G6 Plus features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality photographs and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Motorola Moto G6 Plus also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery performance than Moto G6 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.