Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Moto G60, with a score of 80.1 against 79.5. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G60 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, heavier and much thicker cellphone than Moto G60.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a sharper screen than Moto G60, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto G60 features a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G60 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better performance than Moto G60. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. The Moto G60 captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Moto G60 features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.