Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus, with an 80.1 score against 76.1. Although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus, it's noticeably thicker and incredibly heavier. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, providing some extra features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G7 Plus. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher display density.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Moto G7 Plus counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games as the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, both of them have equal internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.