Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G71 5G is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a score of 82.9 against 80.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G71 5G has 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Moto G71 5G construction is newer, a lot lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better looking display than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more storage to install games and applications than Moto G71 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better performance than Moto G71 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Moto G71 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.