Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G8 Plus's overall score of 77.6. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an extremely thicker and notably heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G8 Plus. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G8 Plus. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better pixel count per inch in the display. The Moto G8 Plus's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, both of them have the same 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit longer battery duration than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto G8 Plus shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.