Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power's score of 76. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is way heavier and way thicker than Moto G8 Power.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G8 Power. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel number in each inch of display.
Moto G8 Power takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back. Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Motorola Moto G8 Power both have quite similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB and equal 64 GB internal memory.
The Moto G8 Power features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G8 Power. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G8 Power, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.