Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Moto G9 Power, getting a general score of 80.1 against 78.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10, offering a couple additional features and improved performance. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a incredibly thicker and somewhat heavier device than the Moto G9 Power.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a way higher pixels count per inch in the screen. The Moto G9 Power counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB, the Moto G9 Power also has more internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster CPU than Moto G9 Power. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM. The Moto G9 Power has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
Moto G9 Power counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.