Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it is notably heavier and a lot thicker. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Moto Z Force has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels and a much higher (4K) video resolution. The Moto Z Force counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z Force, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.